Work Package 3 Literature Review

Sample type: All professionals Sample type: students that are in higher education or schools Qualitative studies - Sample size: Above 2 - Type of study: qualitative, phenomenology, case study, ethnography, narrative and longitudinal - Year: post 2013 - Rigour: Studies that address validity and reliability in particular bias that may impact the study Qualitative studies - Sample size: 2 minimum - Type of study: Grounded Theory that has not been tested in other studies - Year: pre 2013 Quantitative studies - Sample size: Above 200 - Type of study: experimental, quasi experimental, observational analytic studies, and longitudinal studies - Year post 2013 - Rigour: Studies that address validity and reliability through statistical measures Quantitative studies - Sample size: below 200 - Type of study: experimental - Year: pre2013 Table 4 Screening Criteria 3.4.2 Phase 2 Quality review and second screen A second screen of the full articles, and a quality review of these were completed. The reviewer considered each article using the screening criteria in table 4. If article was excluded the reviewer noted this in an excel file including o File name of the article o Reference of the article o Reason for excluding 3.4.3 Phase 3: Data extraction Data from the articles were extracted using the template below. These were recorded in a document for each article detailing the table below. A different word document will be created for each article and the file will be named authorname_YEAR.doc and will be stored in a shared folder on teams Theme Data extracted Type of study Country Sector Level Duration of PD (PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT) Strengths of research Weaknesses of research Characteristics of model Impact of model Enablers to implementation/success Pedagogical learning pathway the model and research are aligned to: Knowledge Awareness/Knowledge Deepening/ Leadership Table 5: Data extraction table